Thread:Qwertyxp2000 the second/@comment-1807002-20160328023226/@comment-1807002-20160330030414

I have patience to wait till you have more details from you but can you not remove them in the meantime. I mean you said you are swamped, do you really need to prioritize removing them with a not a real fix adding *sigh* source mode in the summary - if you are too busy to even discuss with us, is all I am getting at.

The values will show if it is deleted or not, in visual mode (I didn't know this till yesterday when I was doing some testing on Brump). So the new infoboxes will show every field in visual no matter what (might as well keep in source) and now that I know that I plan on added invisible notes (for visual source editors) telling them to not fill in basically so they don't accidentally get filled with a bunch of N/A and No's. So removing them won't help much either I think (plus if some get filled in eventually, from an update (not many editors for to templates page to see infobox field details)).

But I haven't broken anything (this bug would exist even if I never came here and as I said above it look like new infoboxes would have been implemented on you guys eventually anyways), that is why it is upsetting, your editing source has a bug/is broken. I did not break nor create a bug, and it is a rude/mean thing to state repeatedly. That at least that is the root of my frustration over this.

But back to possible fixes. I'll see what I can get on the empty fields deal from Portability Gurus.