Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-26854984-20150814235019/@comment-24577221-20150815013400

That sounds interesting. I don't have any objections in principle; I'd say to go for it.

My only quibble is with some of the terminology used. "Merging" isn't an accurate description of what goes on, and "master" and "subsidiary" I find a bit confusing since a "subsidiary" wiki looks first in its own files, and if it fails, only then goes to the "master". I'm brain-dead this evening, and I'm not coming up with anything better. I'll have to think about it a bit.