Thread:Qwertyxp2000 the second/@comment-1807002-20160328023226/@comment-1807002-20160329162114

In all due respect, it is the obsolete editing mode with the bug not the template, the template just currently trips it (as mentioned for reasons unknown). If Wikia chooses not to fix since they mentioned it was obsolete editing mode there is no guarentee other things won't trip it and we can't accommodate a broken machine indefinitely IMO.

Plus are you sure visual mode isn't available to everyone that is the first I heard of it. Because if we have source, visual and an obsolete classic, we have 3 forms of editing to accomodate the obsolete one over the two others as priority is backward, especially if it only selects a few articles. It sounds like to be to disallowed use of a template that is not the official bug, instead of just not using a mode when it doesn't allow - remember it is only a trip for your broken editing mode.

In my honest opinion those with the buggy obsolete editing mode should (just as it comes since it isn't every article at this time and if when it is that should be the writing on the wall to stop using that mode) edit in the mode it allows (especially if there is two other options visual and source and none source mode users to not be allowed to us certain templates) but as I said I think the whole community should decide as a whole.

Not to over step but if community majority over rule admins, the wikia staff can step in (if the community wants to press it) and let the community consensus get what they want so admins don't miss use their power to decide against what a community majority wants - I just don't think it should go that far, the consensus should rule and we no matter who is minority should respect the consensus at least for the time being this issue may evolve or get resolved (we can always reconvene on a later date to see if it has improved or got worse, or if more or less get affected).

And still I have yet to hear if these classic editors are even officially ticketing the issue. It won't get fixed officially if not enough people ticket and what if classic editor gets removed indefinitely due to bugs.

In the end we are not fixing anything by removing the trip so - no, it is not the latter. We just as a community have to decide who it puts out more and then decide deal with source mode once when nessisary or ban certain templates when nessisary.

And as I said above the majority article editors seem to be Qwerty and Forevakill who edit most (especially on regular articles), Forevakill mentioned new members don't even get classic editor as default so it isn't like we are discouraging new editors. BunsenH seems to be mostly maintaining tribe contacts and Friend codes. So I'd recommend let the editing majority who do edit articles work with templates (that trip or not) and make sure the Tribe/friend pages are template free for convenience for both sides.