Thread:Belthazar451/@comment-1807002-20160331191141/@comment-7326455-20160401034754

It's true that I'm inclined to side with Bunsen because he's the guy I made an admin, but even if he weren't from my point of view, he's being perfectly reasonable and you're the one flying off the handle. The title of this very thread can attest to that.

The issue here is simple: a minor - and non-vital - aspect of the new infoboxes causes one of the editors to stop working. That's a completely objective fact - it's either working or it's not, and in this case it's not. There's no need for community census on that point. What you're asking the consensus to do is to simply redefine "not working" to be the normal state - and by "consensus" you appear to mean just yourself and the two non-admins who happen to be this month's most frequent editors, but not the umpteen and a half casual editors who breeze through every day.

Bunsen proposed a perfectly valid solution (or you can call it a workaround if you like, but it still makes things work again) and was even prepared to implement it himself, until you took umbradge at his daring to touch your perfect templates, and headed off on a crusade. At no point was a ban on all templates - or even any templates - anywhere on the table.

The debate is going round and round because you've resorted to just sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting "consensus! consensus!" Kindly tell me at what point I disallowed consensus. If that's even something that can be done.