Thread:Qwertyxp2000 the second/@comment-1807002-20160328023226/@comment-1807002-20160329164412

I mean in the end it is not locking you out from editing period to certain editors who just edit in their desired editing mode on certain pages. If it actually locked you out of editing of course we wouldn't press this, we don't want this unfair and unrealistic. And yes not using something that trips it does come across as an easy bandaid but it isn't an actual fix or an acceptable long term (especially if it gets worse) decision.

As admins you should want to keep your active contributors happy too. And this comes across a bit weird to me as an admin coming from another community that you aren't even trying to see the consensus on this. In the past I have bent over backwards, did things at my incovienece to keep my community happy. In the end, it sounds like you are only accomodating some veteran editors (ourselves?) set in their ways and I just want to know are you really going to do that for what 1% of your editors? At the cost of, all be it minor, improvements but they will add up in the long run and really improve the wiki and upset/put out your majority of active editors. But that is just what it looks like to me, since I consider myself still new/outsider here.

If the rolls were reversed and we were using the broken editing mode, even as a majority community Wikia probably wouldn't step in (unless it was crazy unanimous) - because it is ridiculous to have Wikia staff to force a wikia to work around an obsolete buggy feature.